Showing posts with label women's history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women's history. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 August 2026

Who Do You Think You Are? - Harriet Walter

 

Illustrated portrait of Marie Carandini
Harriet's ancestor, Marie Carandini;
National Library of Australia / Wikimedia Commons


Last Thursday’s episode of Who Do You Think You Are? featured actress Harriet Walter, whose family are undeniably posh.

Much of this episode featured on the exploits of an Italian ancestor — the son of a noble family, who had the grandest of educations, but was drawn to ballet and the stage.

Friday, 20 June 2025

Who Do You Think You Are? - Diane Morgan

 

a tea set and artfully arranged ephemera


Last week's episode of Who Do You Think You Are? wrapped up the current series with actress and comedian Diane Morgan.

Diane is possibly most well-known for mocking TV history programmes by playing hapless historian Philomena Cunk - which is somewhat ironically fitting for this programme.


Diane's personality is what carries this episode forward - there was a genuine element of wondering what she would say next, with a gladness that we were coming along for the ride.

Her family's stories, though, are equally compelling. 

And it turned out that her father's ancestor, German Charlie was, (spoiler alert!) actually a German man known as Charlie - which Diane seemed more genuinely surprised at than I would have guessed.

There are also poignant moments relating to a lost love, killed on the battlefields of World War One.


The stand-out feature of the episode though, is Diane's Scottish ancestor Isabella - who had something of a reputation in her community.

It took a large amount of strength and obstinance, though, for a 19th Century woman to take a man to court over child support payments - often known as maintenance or affiliation

.

It's often surprising to people that there was a mechanism in place to provide child support for unmarried mothers - it somehow doesn't chime with our modern view of Victorian society. 

Making the father pay for the child, though, made it less likely that these children would become a 'burden' on the parish or poor law union (i.e. the state and the taxpayer) - which many saw as a win.

A lot of women were reluctant, however, to come forward and stand before a court - and often to have the details of their love lives cross-examined and then reported in the local press - due to the stigma attached to being an unmarried mother or 'ruined' woman.

To take several different men to court, then, as Isabella did, would have taken some serious gumption on her part!


All in all, this was a highly-entertaining episode to end the series with; let's hope we won't have to wait too long for the next one!




Ready to start your own family history journey? I offer a range of professional genealogy services, check out my website for more details. 

Monday, 7 October 2024

Who Do You Think You Are? - Gemma Collins

 

A selection of old fashioned photos, tea cups, cameras, etc.


Series 21 of Who Do You Think You Are? brought down the curtain with reality TV star Gemma Collins.

This was a solid episode, but after Olly Murs' cracker the episode before, it felt a little anti-climactic.

Still, it probably didn't feel that way to Gemma - and that's what matters!


Gemma's episode featured some difficult discussions surrounding foster care and mental health.

Mostly these were done well - explaining that our modern understanding of schizophrenia is a lot different to the understanding of the condition in the 1950s. 

Sadly, a lot of 'normal' teenage behaviour, i.e. rebelliousness, skipping school, back-talking, - especially pertaining to teenage girls - was caught up in the pathology of the day. This lead to a lot of people becoming institutionalised with no medical need.


I think the episode missed, though, that along with those who were unfairly and wrongly entangled in the system, were people who were genuinely unwell.

Was Gemma's biological grandmother one of them? It's not clear - we don't have her medical notes, and the only first-hand accounts we have are from people who were children at the time, and unaware of their aunt being a patient at mental health hospitals.

It's impossible to tell whether or not Gemma's grandmother was treated fairly or unfairly without having more information - but that ambiguity wasn't really, in my opinion, made clear enough to Gemma. 


She seemed to come away with the conclusion that her grandmother had been one of those who were institutionalised for normal, frowned-upon, behaviour - which is entirely possible.

The circumstantial evidence of her teenage pregnancy and the known attitudes of some of the medical leaders at the institutions she was a patient at, strengthen that possibility.

But it's also entirely possible that her grandmother was extremely unwell. Because that also would have resulted in her becoming a patient at those same hospitals.

We sadly can't know - with the information presented - what the reality of the case might be, and it would have been better, in my opinion, to make that more clear.


Other parts of the episode included the criminality and poverty of London at the turn of the 20th Century, and Gemma's roots in Essex.

The latter was probably one of the less surprising features, but the remoteness and uniqueness of the Essex island Gemma's family came from was interesting enough.


Again, this was a solid episode, but probably would have been better off in a different place in the running order.



Ready to start your own family history journey? I offer a range of professional genealogy services, check out my website for more details.

Wednesday, 28 June 2023

Who Do You Think You Are? - Kevin Clifton


Canadian flag


Last week's episode of Who Do You Think You Are? featured celebrity dancer Kevin Clifton, known to everyone as 'Kevin from Grimsby.'

And while Kevin is, indeed, from Grimsby, his family history takes him much further away.


This episode featured one side of Kevin's family - his paternal line, whose history is mostly based in Canada.

And it's here that things get very interesting.

But also difficult - history is often uncomfortable, and this was something an emotional Kevin found out.

He lamented that it was 'always the men' in this ancestral line who inflicted the most pain and suffering on the women of his family, and had to grapple with being the descendant of both the men who caused the pain and the women who suffered from it.


A case of divorce in his family's past was covered in the newspapers - divorce being something highly unusual both at the time and in that particular area.

The press coverage was... revealing - with the husband taking a pre-emptive strategy, including denying - prior to any allegations being made - that he chased his wife with an axe and threatened to kill her. It's a very telling thing to try to get out in front of.

The abuse that was admitted to in court was bad enough, but considered acceptable at the time - it hopefully stands as a testament to social progress that admitting, in a court of law, that you had given your wife black eyes is no longer seen as a reasonable thing, and would now affect the divorce proceedings.


The main 'thread' of the episode, though, was the story - passed down through generations - of an Indigenous woman named Matooskie.

While it's not uncommon for families - especially in the US and Canada - to acquire a myth of Native heritage somewhere along the way, a specific name is much less so.

Matooskie, it turns out, was a First Nations (Canadian Indigenous) woman, who Kevin-from-Grimsby is directly descended from. 

A well-documented and somewhat iconic individual amongst First Nations historians, her story is even more interesting than my brief description of this episode (hopefully) makes it sound.

To me, though, what is truly important is not only that the story was passed down through the family, but that her Native name - Matooskie - is the one that was remembered by her descendants, rather than her Christian/European name of Nancy. 

It shows that regardless of her descriptions in church records as 'a half-breed woman' or her callous treatment by her Scottish husband, she retained her culture and her identity - enough to pass it down through the centuries.



Ready to start your own family history journey? I offer a range of professional genealogy services, check out my website for more details.

Wednesday, 29 June 2022

Who Do You Think You Are? - Matt Lucas and Anna Maxwell Martin


Presenter and comedian Matt Lucas' episode of Who Do You Think You Are? was focussed on the experiences of his Jewish family during the terrible events of the Holocaust.

Specifically, he wanted to know about his Jewish grandmother's experiences in pre-war Berlin, and what had become of her extended family afterwards.

Recent history can sometimes be the most devastating, affecting, as it does, people we knew and loved.


Like many, Matt Lucas' relatives sought safety in a place that they thought would be safe - Amsterdam in The Netherlands.

Sadly, The Netherlands did not remain safe for long - despite being a neutral country, Germany invaded and occupied the country from 10th May 1940. 

This meant that Dutch Jewish communities were also persecuted and murdered in the Holocaust. The safety of Amsterdam was no longer safe.


A big surprise came when Matt found that one of his family members had known, and lived with, Anne Frank and her family before they went into hiding - and in fact Anne had mentioned him in her diary.

It's another example of just how personal the past becomes through the lens of family history.



array of vintage items



Actress Anna Maxwell Martin's episode also featured difficult events in the lives of her grandparents.

Following her Irish paternal family, her uncle explained a little more to her about how difficult it was for their grandparents when one of their three sons died of Leukaemia. 

It was also interesting that her uncle's view, as the older brother, was a little more measured than the experiences of Anna's father, who was younger when their brother died and felt more of a coldness in their collective childhoods than Anna's uncle did.


Turning to her maternal Scottish family, Anna looked into the family of her grandfather, Maxwell - whose name she took as part of her stage name.

Maxwell's upbringing was harder and more cruel than Anna had imagined. As a five-year-old child, after the death of his mother, Maxwell had been sent to an orphanage - where he was separated from his sisters, due to a policy of splitting boys and girls.

His father - Anna's great-grandfather - was still alive at the time, which led Anna on a journey of finding out why he had not been able to care for his younger children.


What followed was a tale of drunkenness and severe domestic abuse - for which Maxwell's father went to prison several times.

He was obviously returning to his wife when released from prison, as many of their large family of children were born after his first recorded offence.

Which may explain why, despite having died in her 40s, the picture of Maxwell's mother looks like an elderly lady. Her life was not an easy one.


One of the more difficult things about family history is that we can't change the past.

We can only try to understand and honour what our family members have been through.





Looking for your own family's story? I offer a range of genealogy services. Feel free to drop me an e-mail to discuss your research needs.




Wednesday, 29 July 2020

A Voice From the Last Pandemic

I came across this article in The Aberdare Leader, 4th January 1919, reproducing part of a letter from a Welsh woman in San Francisco to her friends back home.

Some of the cultural attitudes, e.g. to the Turkish harem, are out-dated, but much of the day-to-day experience of life in a pandemic sounds extremely familiar...



WELSH LADY'S EXPERIENCE.
-
RAVAGES OF THE "FLU" IN SAN FRANCISCO.
-

   A lady resident in Wales until a 
few years ago, and who is now in
San Francisco, writes to friends here
giving details of the terrible rav-
ages of the influenza epidemic in that
far-away city. The following extract
from her letter will be of interest: -

   "Have you got the Spanish flu very
bad? It is terrible here, funerals
going by all day and the ambulance
rushing about at all hours. All pic-
ture shows, theatres, schools and
churches are closed. Our meeting
room is closed. Doctors and nurses
are dying, and we are so short of
them because so many of them have
gone to France. I do not know what
we should do if it was not for the
Red Cross. They have had to let the
women out of prison to help nurse
the sick. We have lost more soldiers
through death in the training camps
than in France fighting. Every man,
woman and child has to wear a mask
of four-fold white muslin, which cov-
ers the mouth and nose, leaving noth-
ing but the eyes to be seen. We all
look as if we had just come out of a 
Turkish harem. If a policeman
catches anyone without a mask, or
one not properly fixed, he runs them
in for 10 days, or 100 dollars fine
(£20.) All soldiers and sailors have
to wear them. They look so funny,
hundreds of them drilling with white
masks, and at night in the street cars
we look like a lot of ghosts, and do
not know our best friends. It is hard
on the girls and men in the stores:
they have to wear them all day. The
schools have been turned into hos-
pitals. All the bodies are cremated,
and the clothes which belonged to them
also.      I think that was has
saved me up to now is my being so
much in the fresh air. I have a nice
sleeping porch in my cottage with
windows all round, of which I always
have one or two open at night. Most
of the windows have been taken out
of the street cars to give us plenty
of air. It is an awful plague. I have
got my clothes all ready in case I
have to be rushed off to the hospital."

Thursday, 12 July 2018

WDYTYA? - Olivia Colman

Monday's episode of Who Do You Think You Are? featured actress Olivia Colman.

For me, Olivia's bouncy attitude is what made this episode worth the watch - she really did make it interesting just by being there!






Of course, her family's story was also really interesting!

This episode really benefitted from a family that could've waltzed straight out of Dickens or Austen, encompassing India, Portugal, and France, and death, divorce, and some very strong women.



And of course it's hard not to be at least a little envious when someone's family were posh enough to have actual painted portraits!

This episode had all of the amazing twists and turns you would hope for in a episode of Who Do You Think You Are? and hopefully is a great indication of the standard of the rest of the series.




Again though, what really made this episode was Colman's investment in not only the highs, but the lows as well.

Yes, there were the patented Who Do You Think You Are? tears. Many of them, in fact!







Tuesday, 12 June 2018

WDYTYA? - Michelle Keegan

Michelle Keegan's episode of Who Do You Think You Are? was a tale of survivors.

One of her main family lines originated in Gibraltar - which, if you don't know, is a British dependency off the coast of Spain.





vintage style collage






Gibraltar was largely evacuated in WW2, due to both its strategic importance, and it's vulnerable position in the heart of Europe.

The civilian refugees - people who, though largely Spanish-speaking, considered themselves Brits - were sent to many locations, including the UK mainland.

These British citizens found themselves in the odd position of being treated as foreigners on the British mainland - strangers in their own country.




Another Gibraltarian ancestor had emigrated from Genoa in Italy, alone, at the age of just 13.

He worked his way to a moderately successful - if slightly on the edge of the law - business at the port.




A separate line of Michelle's family hail from her own native Manchester, where Michelle found that one of her ancestors was a suffragist.

I think that a little more could have been made of the differences between suffragists and suffragettes, since this seemed a bit rushed-in at the end, but I guess it can be hard to decide what to include sometimes!






The BBC are doing one of their patented random gaps between WDYTYA? episodes, so I have no idea when the next one's on!

Monday, 4 June 2018

New WDYTYA? Series (+ Info on My Privacy Policy)







The 15th series of Who Do You Think You Are? starts this week with Michelle Keegan, actress from BBC series Our Girl.



Other celebrities featured in series 15 are:

  • Olivia Colman, actress
  • Boy George, musician
  • Shirley Ballas, Strictly Come Dancing judge
  • Lee Mack, comedian
  • Marvin Humes, former JLS member and TV presenter
  • Robert Rinder, TV's Judge Rinder
  • Jonnie Peacock, Paralympian








Here in Wales, the series is premiering at 23.05 (11.05pm) on Wednesday (6th June,) on BBC1 Wales.

In Scotland, it premiers at 21.00 (9pm) on Thursday (7th June) on BBC1 Scotland.

And everywhere else, it premiers at 21.00 (9pm) on Wednesday (6th June,) on your local BBC1.

I'm hoping to write summaries for the episodes again - so look out for that!










Also worth a look for fans of history is Suffragettes with Lucy Worsley, on tonight on BBC1 at 20.30 (8.30pm)




On a business note, you may've heard about the new GDPR EU regulations.

I take your privacy and the collection of your data seriously, and you can see my privacy policy here.








Friday, 14 July 2017

WDYTYA? - Craig Revel Horwood

Craig Revel Horwood's episode of Who Do You Think You Are?, while not as dramatic as last week's episode with Charles Dance, was quite interesting.

I personally think his 100-year-old grandmother is simply amazing, and he should definitely visit her more than once in four years! (You couldn't make it for her 100th birthday, Craig?! Come on!)






The episode was very much a case of rags to riches (and then back to rags again,) with Craig's part of the family missing out on a sizeable inheritance because they're descended from the female line.

It's sad but true that to many patriarchs of the past, a daughter or granddaughter was literally worth less than a son.



For me though, the highlight was the image conjured by a newspaper ad; of men from the North of England having a dance-off in a rural sheep station in Australia.

That's worthy of a Monty Python sketch, surely!





Friday, 23 October 2015

WDYTYA? - Frances de la Tour

Well! That's Series 12 done and dusted in style, with last night's episode starring British actress Frances de la Tour, who has suitably posh ancestors (have you ever noticed how many of our actors and actresses are descended from aristocrats?)

 
But there was the whiff of scandal throughout the lives of these aristocratic ladies - and Frances followed the path of affairs, drugs, and the stifling conditions of life as a high-class woman. It never ceases to surprise me just how naïve celebrities can sometimes be in Who Do You Think You Are? episodes. Maybe it's just the hardened genealogist in me that automatically jumps to affairs and opium - not that I was wrong!

So, with intriguing stories and access to surviving historical documents that most of us can only dream of, Frances de la Tour closed off the series with a compelling and interesting episode.

Friday, 2 October 2015

WDYTYA? - Anita Rani

Anita Rani - One Show presenter, and weekend twinkle-toes on this season of Strictly Come Dancing - explored her family's history in last night's episode of Who Do You Think You Are?

Anita's family are of Sikh and Hindu Indian heritage - and so it was off to India to discover her grandfather's troubled history. What was revealed was easily one of the most tragic and heart-breaking stories featured in Who Do You Think You Are? It was a story of conflict, violence, the partition of India and Pakistan, and the atrocities that take place when prejudice blinds men to the rights-and-wrongs of this world.

More than anything, this was a story of violence against women - something which this part of the world (and, many would argue, the rest of the world too,) still struggles with to this day. Only one or two generations ago, the women in this region of India were killed, or forced to kill themselves, to stop them from falling into the hands of the men of the opposite faction. Ethnic and religious differences led to the horrendous deaths of innumerable women and girls, many of whom were killed at the hands of those who were supposed to protect them. Perhaps, difficult though it may be, we should bring these things, these bloody and forgotten histories, to light more often - as a lesson to all.

Thursday, 15 January 2015

Tales of Impropriety

People have always been people - and the Victorians were less shocked by what went on in their towns than you might think. For example, I found this quite casual newspaper report from the Cardiff Times on 4 October 1879:


Image courtesy of dan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
MERTHYR
 
A CASE DISMISSED - At the police-court on
Monday - the Stipendiary on the bench - Mary
Evans, a prostitute, was brought up charged with
stealing a dress, the property of another frail
sister named Elizabeth Jones. As prosecutrix
did not appear, the prisoner was discharged.

'Frail sisters' was a common euphemism, as was 'nightwalker' or 'lady of ill repute.'

Thursday, 25 September 2014

Queen Wars!

I came across this interesting write-up of the results of a poll which asked the question: Who was the best English/British Queen?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the famous Tudor Queen Elizabeth I comes out very well in the poll!

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

The Queen's Lover?

The Victorians were prim, proper, and moral to the point of insanity, right? Maybe not. There's always been a question or two hovering over that most famous of Victorian ladies, Queen Victoria herself, and her Scottish servant John Brown.

This fascinating article from the New York Times explores the relationship - one of certainly confidante levels of intimacy (she referred to him as her 'best friend') which would have been seen as quite unseemly between a man of his class and the widowed Queen.

One doctor of Queen Victoria, Sir James Reid, referred to one instance of intimacy which involved some skirt (and kilt) lifting - though this may have been fairly innocent by today's standards, at the very least there would have been some showing of leg, unthinkable in the Victorian period. Completely scandalous between unmarried individuals of any class - a Queen and her servant being quite so flirtatious would have been atrociously sinful! And is there truth to the secret instructions to place the wedding ring of John Brown's mother onto the Queen's finger after her death? She certainly couldn't marry him in life! A servant! How dreadful!

So maybe, then, there was less of the prude to the Queen than there at first would seem. Maybe she too, displayed the behind-closed-doors hypocrisy partaken in by so many.

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

The Question of Mrs Maybrick

I doubt you've ever heard of Florence Maybrick, but she was the name on everyone's lips in 1889. On trial for murder, on trial for her life, Florence was accused of killing her husband.

Florence Chandler was a girl from Alabama, young and naïve. She married James Maybrick, a cotton trader, and together they lived in Liverpool. James was almost twenty years her senior. This was a fashionable marriage - American high-society girls marrying into 'old world' money. It was a marriage that soon ran into trouble - within a few years there were arguments and the spectre of divorce (attainable, though expensive, difficult to obtain, and socially shameful.) Florence's husband, a drug addict with a fascination for all things tonic and medicinal, was having an affair, was acting somewhat irrationally, and on at least one occasion had hit his wife (something that was socially and legally acceptable so long as the 'punishment' the husband dealt out was in proportion to the alleged misdoing by his wife.)

James, never in good health, became severely ill and died not long after. So, why would it be suspected that his dear wife - his dear 'bunny' - had killed him? Firstly, a few circumstances that may have been innocent - soaking flypapers in water (to extract arsenic for cosmetic purposes,) adding something to a bottle of meat juice (common invalid food) which may or may not have been on the behest of her husband, moving medicine from one bottle to another to prevent sediment from forming at the bottom, being accused by a, frankly delusional, ill husband, etc. etc. The second, and more damning in the Victorian mind frame, was that Florence Maybrick had had an affair with a man named Alfred Brierley - had stayed in a hotel with him over several nights - anyone capable of infidelity must be capable of murder. The fact that her husband kept a mistress seemed to nobody to bare any importance.

And so, the odds were stacked against poor Florence. In her favour was slowly rising public support - with a notable female faction, and the poor scientific evidence against her. Toxicology was in its infancy, with the fallibility of medical knowledge and early tests for poison. The scientific experts and doctors could not agree on the cause of death - many argued for arsenic poisoning while others said it was more likely that James had been killed by a bad infection or gastroenteritis. Certainly, there was not sufficient arsenic found in James' remains or excreta to kill (and, for those of you more scientifically minded, the remains decayed at the normal rate, instead of being partially preserved by arsenic.) Florence had also been the victim of that most heinous of Victorian class-crimes - insubordination. Her children's nurse had made accusations against her (her mistress! oh, the scandal!) and had even read her personal correspondence (to her lover, Alfred Brierley.)

Arsenic was commonly found in almost everything in the Victorian period - food, medicine, cooking utensils, wallpaper, clothes; it wasn't as if it was difficult to purchase or find in the average house. In the Maybrick's home for example, amongst the sources of arsenic found was a packet of the stuff designed specifically, according to the label, for poisoning cats. It was in a great deal of James' medicines (along with some other, equally tasty ingredients,) and when he became ill the doctors prescribed a series of medicines and tonics, any of which could have reacted with one another, and included such substances as nitro-glycerine and cocaine.

But Florence was faced with a biased judge who, it seems, did his utmost to prejudice the jury against her, a jury made up entirely of men, and a national press that had reported so many details of her life and trial that many had already made up their minds as to her guilt or otherwise.

The case raised many issues with the justice system: all male juries, the impermissibility of defendants to give evidence in cases which may result in capital punishment, and the lack of a criminal appeal system - as well as society: the place of women, the responsibilities of servants, the morbid fascination that such trials created, and the sense that moral impurity created criminal tendencies.

To find out more about the Maybrick case (including what happened to Mrs Maybrick,) I highly recommend Kate Colquhoun's book Did She Kill Him?: A Victorian tale of Deception, Adultery, and Arsenic - a very informative and descriptive book, though perhaps a little flowery and imaginative in places. The case is well discussed, though sometimes the tone falls more towards fiction than non-fiction. This is the book in which I found a great deal of the information for this post.

And, just to prove the fallibility of the press (even then,) I found that the Pembrokeshire Herald and General Advertiser on 24 May 1889 repeated the general misreporting that Florence was 'a French Canadian, the daughter of a baron.' Florence was from Alabama, not Canada, and her mother - an eccentric and colourful lady - was indeed the Baroness von Roques, but Baron von Roques (who had by this point abandoned her mother,) was not her father - that honour belonged to one of the Baroness' previous husbands, Mr. Chandler.

Friday, 8 August 2014

WDYTYA? - Julie Walters

So, there we are, first episode of the 2014 series (series 11.) While perhaps it wasn't the ground-breaking episode a season opener deserves, it was still a fairly interesting episode. It started off kind of slowly, with tales of Irish agricultural workers (not that there's anything wrong with that but I think perhaps a touch too much time was devoted to it,) and then picked up when Julie learned of her ancestors' association with the Land League.

The Land League, seen in their day as radicals, was an association of tenant farmers who wanted fairer rents and better tenancy agreements from the landowners, particularly at a time when they barely had enough money to feed their children. So radical was this seen to be (it is, after all, a very early form of socialism when you think about it,) that Julie's ancestor, Anthony Clarke, had to flee the country to avoid arrest. When Anthony returned to Ireland, he was arrested for another reason - seemingly unjustly.

Another side of Julie's family, the O'Brien's, were also involved in the Land League; Maria O'Brien was part of the Women's Land League - supposedly a charitable organisation, this was a cover that allowed them to take part in politics and continue the work that the men's part of the Land League could not then continue. Maria's maiden name was Buchanan, and it turned out that her father was on a very different side of the debate - that which took over the land of evicted tenants. It was really interesting to see Julie try to work out in her head whether Cummins Buchanan was justified in his actions or not. Overall, a slow and steady start to the series - and hopefully with more enjoyable episodes to follow.

Wednesday, 23 July 2014

Looks Like A Job For A Woman

Image courtesy of dan/FreeDigitalPhotos.net
The British Red Cross' Voluntary Aid Detachments (VADs) were an integral part of the medical system for wounded soldiers of the first world war. Many VADs were women, ready to help the wounded. 11,000 women of the general service section of the VADs took over the jobs of men who went abroad to fight - this included cooks, clerks, and storekeepers. VADs also undertook air raid duties in London (there were air raids in the First World War as well as the Second.)

So the women kept the country moving, and when the men returned, they were expected to go back to being wives and mothers (much as like the Second World War.) There was a step forward for women's rights however, women would soon by granted the vote. Their voices would soon be heard.

If you want to know more about VADs, you can take a look at the Red Cross website.

Thursday, 29 May 2014

Some Things Never Change

This is a joke from The Cambrian News and Merionethshire Standard from 3rd March, 1916. It's a little tame, but it shows that teenage girls even in 1916 were not always prim and proper:

"What course is Sarah studying at that boarding-school?" "I can't remember, but I think it's cosmetics."

Wednesday, 23 April 2014

At Home with the Georgians (BBC)

Georgian
Image courtesy of sattva/FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Last night's episode of the At Home with the Georgians on BBC Four (originally on BBC Two) is perfect for all of you who love Georgian architecture, interiors, fabric, wallpaper, etc...

I recommend a cup of tea (or something stronger if you wish) and a box of chocolates to accompany you as you watch it on iPlayer and pretend that you live in the world that the wonderful Amanda Vickery describes. I particularly like the part where she describes the quilt as the family's history (but then, I would!)

And, if you haven't had your fill of pretty fabrics, I suggest looking at the V & A museum collection images - including this pretty piece of dress fabric.

Of course, all these pretty relics of the past once belonged to real people who had families, lives, aspirations, problems, and maybe descendants out there right now. What your family may have owned or enjoyed of these things varies according to circumstance, but as the section of the programme showing the foundling hospital demonstrates, beautiful fabric could be owned by the poorest and most desperate, as well as the richest. And, as I'm sure you're fed up of me saying by now, the only way to gain a true understanding of your ancestry, is to also learn about social and local history.